• HOME

  • PRACTICES

  • PEOPLE

  • CONTACT

  • More

    Bend Man Sues Bank Over Home's Foreclosure

    October 6, 2011

    |

    By Barney Lerten, KTVZ.COM

     

    Still in Home, Sold by Bank as Son Returned From Iraq

    BEND, Ore. -- A Bend man whose home was foreclosed upon the very day his son came home on leave from the Iraq war zone remains in the home. But after two months of legal limbo, he filed a federal lawsuit Thursday against J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, seeking at least $250,000 in damages, enough to recover his home, and an injunction against any eviction notice.
    The 26-page complaint seeks "equitable redemption due to wrongful foreclosure" and also accuses the bank of breach of contract and unlawful debt collection.

    Collette bought the Bend home in 2006 with a $127,000 down payment. When his small flooring and countertop business was hurt by the economic downturn, he contacted Chase for help.
    But according to Economic Fairness Oregon, which has taken up Collette's case, "Chase put Tim on a collision course with foreclosure – advising him to skip payments to qualify for help, putting him on a trial modification for nine months, then denying him a permanent modification and slapping him with $9,000 in penalties and arrears."

    "Unfortunately, Tim's situation is not unique,” says his lawyer, John Bowles. “His case is representative of what thousands of Oregonians are going through every month."

    Collette's son, Aaron Collette, arrived home on leave from Iraq on Aug. 9, just hours after Chase sold his family’s home in a foreclosure proceeding on the Deschutes County Courthouse steps.
    Weeks earlier, the father and son's story began to draw widespread media coverage and has attracted the attention of politicians and activists. More than 120,000 supporters signed a petition created by EFO on behalf of Tim Collette on change.org.

    Bowles said Fannie Mae bought the property at the foreclosure sale, "which really was a sham, because Fannie Mae already owned the loan."

    "Chase was misrepresenting its position as an owner of the loan and as a creditor with the right to non-judicially foreclose," the attorney said. "There were no assignments of the deed of trust to either Fannie Mae or Chase."

    Collette remains in the home, in limbo, with no eviction action taken. He said he’s taking up this fight not just for his family, but for the countless other homeowners in the same boat.
    “People who play by the rules and do what their banks tell them shouldn’t end up with nothing,” Collette said. “It’s time for people to stand up and demand some real accountability from these corporations that we bailed out as taxpayers.”

    Chase Bank spokeswoman Darcy Wilmot in Seattle said the bank could not comment on pending litigation.

    Economic Fairness Oregon has been working with Collette since he attended a community meeting on foreclosure earlier this year. Since then, he has testified on behalf of mortgage servicing reform three times before the state Legislature, and Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., shared his story on the floor of the U.S. Senate.

    The lawsuit seeks "economic damages of no less than $250,000 or an amount to be proven at trial" for violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. It also seeks "monetary damages sufficient to permit him to recover title to his home."

    Find out more at: http://homecomingwithoutahome.com/.

    Angela Martin, executive director of EFO, noted that Oregon is a non-judicial foreclosure state.

    "Non-judicial foreclosures are a fast-track process that allows banks to foreclose just using some forms and paperwork," she said. "No judge or anyone outside the bank ever reviews it, unless the homeowner challenges it.

    "Given that there is no judicial oversight, Oregon law includes strict safeguards to ensure fairness and accuracy," Martin said. "One of the principal protections is the requirement that all assignments of the trust deed be publicly recorded in the county land records where the property is located. Public recording establishes a clear chain of ownership that allows all parties to understand who has the right to foreclose should the homeowner default. This system has worked well enough since 1959."

    "The banking industry and their lobbyists would like you to believe that homeowners like Tim are looking for technical loopholes in an effort to get off scot-free," Martin said. "That is simply not the case. We are a nation of laws. During the heydays of the housing boom, banks cut corners in order to facilitate their high stakes, fast paced betting. Now that those risky bets have gone sour, they want to rewrite the rules and point the finger of blame at homeowners who seek to assert their legal rights."

    Martin told KTVZ.COM shes "not going to presume to understand" why no eviction action has been taken in the closely watched case.

    "The facts in Tim's case are simple," she said. "Chase failed to follow Oregon law when they foreclosed on Tim's home. Judges ruling on similar Oregon cases have been clear: Oregon law giving lenders the right to foreclose without judicial oversight requires lenders to prove standing by publicly recording all assignments. Chase did not follow the law. This isn't a technicality -- this is due process."

    Tags:

    Court

    Foreclosure

    bowlesfernandez

    lawyer

    attorney

    Bowles

    Please reload

    Featured Posts

    Florida Attorneys Expose How Improper Influence From the Financial Industry has Contributed to the Destruction of the Negotiability of Mortgage Promis...

    October 12, 2015

    Jeffrey A. Myers, Bowles Fernández Law LLC, Lake Oswego, argued the cause for plaintiffs. With him on the briefs were Jeffrey A. Myers, John Bowles, a...

    BRANDRUP v. RECONTRUST COMPANY BAC LP 2006 2CB

    June 13, 2013

    US home foreclosures continuing to fall, latest data shows

    February 2, 2016

    1/5
    Please reload

    Recent Posts

    What Is a Wrongful Foreclosure?

    April 1, 2016

    US home foreclosures continuing to fall, latest data shows

    February 2, 2016

    Mortgage Rates Increased Slightly, Remains Below 4% for 12th Straight Week

    October 20, 2015

    Insecure homes

    October 20, 2015

    Freddie Mac, Quicken Loans partner to offer low-down payment mortgages Innovative new programs tailored to first-time and Millennial buyers

    October 19, 2015

    Home mortgage hurdles hurt the market For many responsible borrowers, credit is still out of reach

    October 16, 2015

    Need a Mortgage? Keep Debt Levels in Check.

    October 16, 2015

    A notice of removal need include only a plausible allegation that the amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdictional threshold; the notice need not...

    October 15, 2015

    Federal Tort Claim Act time limits are subject to equitable tolling.

    October 15, 2015

    Robert Reich: Bernie gets it. Hillary is only inviting more corruption

    October 14, 2015

    Please reload

    Archive

    April 2016 (1)

    February 2016 (1)

    October 2015 (19)

    September 2015 (3)

    January 2015 (1)

    June 2013 (2)

    January 2013 (2)

    August 2012 (1)

    March 2012 (1)

    October 2011 (2)

    Please reload

    Search By Tags

    Appeals

    Bowles

    Court

    Fannie Mae

    Foreclosure

    Freddy Mac

    HUD

    MERS

    McDonalds

    Mortgage

    Wall Street

    attorney

    bowlesfernandez

    foreclosure

    injury

    lawyer

    Please reload

    • Facebook Social Icon
    • LinkedIn Social Icon

    Call us at: 503.726.5930 or email us

    © 2015, 2019 All Rights Reserved - Bowles Fernandez Law